Select Page


Covert Action in Plain View – Just Look Up – Pay Attention
No Hearings Have Been Held
Chemtrails Are Different From Ordinary Contrails
Conspiracy Theory or Conspiracy Fact?

White Skies and Chemtrails over Lynnwood 3-5-2015
White Skies and Chem Trails over Lynnwood 11-17-2014
Chemtrail Jets over Lynnwood Making the Sign of the Cross 7-2-2015

Perry Como Sang:
The Bluest Skies Are In Seattle
But No More

I was talking with old friend, Tom about this web site. He found this White Skys page  and asked “woooo, are you are a chemtrail conspiracy theorist?” Tom is an exceedingly conventional liberal Democrat.

There are bogus conspiracy theories and valid conspiracy theories. Chemtrails are different from ordinary contrails. NASA admits that airplanes are spraying numerous substances in the sky. The only remaining issues are whether these chemicals are harmful and who has authorized them.

A lot of planes fly over Lynnwood. Some are taking off and landing at Paine Field, just north of our home. Some are coming in from Japan and New York, curving to the south to land at SeaTac. Others fly over at high altitude, usually headed to or from Asia. In most cases there are no contrails. If there are, they are short and disappear quickly.

On some clear days the skies are a beautiful deep blue.

On other days when the skies would be blue, the skies are crisscrossed by jet aircraft which leave behind thick, white aerosol trails, which spread out and make the sky milky white.

Ordinary jet contrails are short, dissipate quickly, and do not spread out to make the sky white. So-called chemtrails are thick – like the exhaust from a car which has blown a head gasket. These formations do not disappear. They widen and gradually fill the sky with a white haze. These are not normal contrails, made of ice crystals, which fade away in a few minutes. These new chemtrails are something different. These planes laying these down usually come from the south-south east and head towards the north-north west, roughly from McChord AFB to Whidbey Island Air Naval Station. The planes are flying at a various altitudes,but usually at lower altitudes, which I would estimate at 10,000 feet.

I look out my window as I work, and when I see a chemtrail forming, I grab my camera and take a photo or video.

If you are not aware of this whitening of the sky, it means you are not looking up. Most people do not pay much attention to the sky. We are thinking about traffic or whatever we are doing.

Look up. Pay attention. What is happening to our skies is not natural.

Professor Marvin Herndon of San Diego has written a paper in which he advances evidence that chemtrails are composed of coal fly ash, which is laden with many toxic elements and chemicals. The paper was quickly retracted by the journal for alleged mathematical errors. Dr. Herndon told me that any errors in the numbers did not invalidated the validity of his paper. However, he corrected the errors. This is his corrected version.

The EPA had previously required that coal burning utility plants capture the coal fly ash from their smoke stacks. The coal fly ash slurry obtained accumulated in land fills behind dikes. In 2008 the dike at the Kensington coal plant in Tennessee burst and flooded a valley with slurry.

In April of 2015 the EPA ruled that coal fly ash can be used for “wallboard, concrete, roofing materials, and bricks in a way that minimizes the CCR from escaping into the surrounding environment“. This is pretty amazing, given that the ash was accumulating only because the EPA required that it be captured. The new regulations allowed it to be put into the drywall in your home and the concrete in the building where you work.

There are no known regulations by the Federal Administration or any other agency which authorize aerosol spraying. No federal or state hearings have ever been held on aerosol spraying. There is no statute or regulation which authorizes this. Whatever is going on being done without any public discussion.

Nevertheless citizens and scientists are asking questions. Some suggest that these white skies are attempts to shield us from too much sun to reduce global warming. Others suggest that positively charged metal ions being sprayed – aluminum and barium – can be bombarded with microwave radiation over long distances and heated, the result being weather warfare.

I call this covert action in plain view.

I do not know what is going on. Maybe this is all normal. Maybe jets are burning a new and different kind of fuel which is completely harmless. In any case, we should demand answers.

If you want to dig into this subject, follow the links below:

NASA official Douglass E. Roland, in a conversation taped July 10, 2013, admits that NASA is spraying lithium and other chemicals. See:

5 parallel trails

Military whistle blower

Dr. Russell Blaylock

Illegal 50 USC 1520

SoCal Sky Watch


Arizona State Senator Kelli Ward Holds Public Forum on
Geo-Engineering, Weather Modification

Derrick Broze
Activist Post

Kingman, Arizona, June 27, 2014 – On Wednesday, June 25, Arizona State Senator Kelli Ward held a public forum to discuss public concerns regarding white vapor trails in the skies. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) representatives Sherri Zendri and Beth Hager were on hand to answer questions from local residents who presented studies, personal research, and blood samples they claim prove that planes are spraying chemicals.

Senator Ward stated the meeting was a response to “relentless” communication from constituents who are concerned with vapor trails commonly called contrails or condensation trails. However, residents say the trails are not standard contrails but rather “chemtrails” being sprayed as part of a global program of weather manipulation. One resident claimed the difference between contrails and chemical trails is easy to spot because the contrails are short and dissipate quickly, while the chemtrails are long, dragged out, and crisscross the sky.

Meeting attendees listed a variety of reasons they believe the government is spraying. These include poisoning of the food and people to manipulating the weather patterns. Senator Ward and the ADEQ representatives repeatedly told attendees that they have no jurisdiction over chemical spraying whether it was happening or not. In a video of the meeting the frustration from citizens is easily seen.

ADEQ communications director Mark Shaffer said they regularly receive phone calls and emails on the topic, but “Our standard response has been that there is no credible scientific evidence about chemical spraying or geoengineering.” Geo-engineering is the science of manipulating the climate for the stated purpose of fighting man-made climate change. These include Solar Radiation Management (SRM), the practice of spraying aerosols into the sky in an attempt to deflect the Sun’s rays and combat climate change.white-skys-3

According to a recent congressional report:

The term “geoengineering” describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.

Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.

white-skys-2One of the many dangers of manipulating the weather is the loss of blue skies. According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere would scatter sunlight into the atmosphere. He says this could decrease the amount of sunlight that hits the ground by 20% and make the sky appear more hazy.

Although a number of authorities have warned about the dangers of geoengineering techniques, the risks are seen as secondary to the perceived risks of climate change. The interesting thing to note is that although proponents of geoengineering hail it as the solution to climate change and sustaining life, studies show that geoengineering could actually have the reverse effect of heating the Earth.

According to a recent study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then suddenly halted the planet could see an immediate rise in temperatures, particularly over land. The study, titled “The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management”, seems to indicate that once you begin geoengineering you cannot suspend the programs without causing the very problem you were seeking to resolve.

Many of those who were in attendance to the Arizona meeting believe the SRM programs are not only in the developmental research phase but are currently active. Weather modification techniques in the form of cloud-seeding programs are active in China, for example. With researchers warning that the very initiation of geoengineering programs could cause global temperatures to rise, it does make sense that governments would work to keep quiet about domestic geoengineering programs. Geoengineering in one country could cause drought in another part of the world after all, and no government wants that responsibility.

white-skys-1Arizona citizens also pointed to a 1996 document entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025” where the U.S. Air Force discusses a number of proposals for using the weather as a weapon. There was also mention of the Environmental Modification Treaty signed by the United States to halt global weather modification. Others mention companies like Weather Modification, Inc. On this corporation’s website you can peruse different planes that you can pay to run a cloud seeding operation. They even offer a list of clients and sites that are active.

Whether or not Senator Ward or the ADEQ hold another meeting on the topic remains to be seen. One thing is certain though, the citizens of Arizona are keeping their eyes on sky and they are not going anywhere anytime soon.

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist, community activist, gardener and promoter from Houston, Texas. He is the co-founder of The Houston Free Thinkers, and co-host of Free Thinker Radio. Broze also hosts and produces a weekly podcast under the name the Conscious Resistance Live. His writing can be found on , The Liberty Beat, the Anti-Media, Activist Post, and Ben, where this article first appeared.


Friday, May 23, 2014

Who gave the U.S. gov’t permission to control the ionosphere in the first place?

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

Yes, HAARP — the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program — can be used to manipulate the weather

…but even though the actual HAARP patent itself —

Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved.” [emphasis added]

the government

David Walker, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, very-matter-of-factly states that they took over from the Navy and will be moving on —

— to managing the ionosphere, what the HAARP was really designed to do, to inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it… [emphasis added]

many meteorologists

Some meteorologists believe that the ionospheric changes in turn influence the weather in the lower atmosphere, but the physical mechanism by which this may occur has not been definitely identified. [emphasis added]

and other prominent scientists


have said so, according to the mainstream media, you’re a scientifically unjustified conspiracy theorist if you do.

Listen to David Walker, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engineering, say it at a recent defense appropriations subcommittee hearing right here.

The real question isn’t whether or not HAARP can be used to control or manipulate the weather.

The real question is, who gave the U.S. government the authority to “inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it” in the first place?

Melissa Melton is a co-founder of, where this first appeared. She is an experienced researcher, graphic artist and investigative journalist with a passion for liberty and a dedication to truth. Her aim is to expose the New World Order for what it is — a prison for the human soul from which we must break free.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share This