Select Page


John Scudamore
, whale.to creator

3-2-2019

Gardasil is not going to prevent cancer and it’s killed at least 700, sterilised and put hundreds in wheelchairs

“The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed: everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless. Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all.I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune! In addition, decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine.” Dr. Bernard Dalbergue

“As long as we have no proof that cervical cancer is caused by HPV… as long as we only have an association, it is fundamentally useless to vaccinate against HPV because the chances are that cervical cancer is not caused by HPV, in which case the cancer will occur whether there is HPV or not." — Christian Fiala, MD, Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

“There is no evidence about the effectiveness of cervical cancer prevention by the HPV vaccines." –Atsuo Yanagisawa, M.D.

“In the area of the iris that corresponds to the uterus, in three of the girls he saw tissue damage, and in the fourth he saw drug residue. In each of the four cases, on reporting back to the patient what he was observing, he was informed that the girl had recently received the cervical cancer vaccine. All were virgins.

Tissue damage in the uterus is what he sees in women who have had such things as abortions and prolapses, and can be a precursor to cancer. It can also cause infertility – as it can prevent the embryo from being able to hold on to the uterus wall. It also often results in lack of sensitivity with sexual intercourse, pain, discomfort and/or frequent discharges.”

Piper-Terry shared: "You know how we’ve been told all those serious adverse reactions to Gardasil are "coincidence" and would have happened anyway? B.S. Merck used the aluminum adjuvant as the "control" in their clinical trials. There was no placebo. Of 7 clinical trials, only one used a placebo (saline solution) and the number of subjects was 594. In comparison, 15,706 subjects received Gardasil and 13, 023 subjects were injected with the aluminum adjuvant. They compared the number of serious adverse events between the Gardasil group ("experimental") and the adjuvant group ("control"). Not surprisingly, there was no significant difference between the number or severity of adverse events between the groups. That’s because aluminum is a neuro-immune toxin and subjects who received the aluminum "control" were disabled, had seizures, developed autoimmune disorders and died at nearly identical rates to those who received the Gardasil vaccine. The serious adverse events are being caused by the aluminum. They are not "coincidence" and they would not have occurred naturally. Take home message: There is no safety data for Gardasil – and this is the status quo for vaccine manufacturers. Do you REALLY think they care about your health? Hint: the 3-shot series is nearly $400. Per person. No wonder they want to vaccinate little boys and infants, too. Just say NO."

[2011] In short a vaccine called Gardasil has been created to address a cancer – when it is known that vaccines are for viruses and have never been proven to work in the case of cancer. Gardasil’s widespread distribution has been made possible by virtue of research that uses outdated and insensitive technology – with the regulator (FDA) and NCI in effect ‘in bed” with both the vaccine manufacturer and the organization that undertakes research testing.

So called independent researchers and experts are conflicted and worse actively seek to deflect better testing options – despite considerable evidence that what is presently used does not work.

Now we have irrefutable evidence that the vaccine contains harmful contaminants (recombinant HPV DNA) that is tightly bound to the adjuvant Aluminium Hydroxyphosphate (itself widely regarded as dangerous to humans) and where the combination of the two is understood to be particularly dangerous and impactful on the immune system. Explaining the extraordinary numbers of reported adverse events post Gardasil vaccination. Meanwhile over 40 million doses (perhaps more than 50 million)) of Gardasil have been distributed globally at a cost of USD$120 per dose and following this, tens of thousands of young women have faced extreme adverse reactions due to Gardasil with over 90 associated deaths (this from a reporting system widely regarded as perhaps reporting between 1 and 10% of actual adverse events). Is anyone seeing the links? Gardasil serves no good purpose, in fact quite the opposite. It needs to be withdrawn from the market immediately and those impacted by it, need to have proper follow‐up and assistance provided to them. An independent and transparent inquiry needs to understand how this occurred, why, who was responsible and ensure that appropriate redress is sought and penalties imposed.

Finally, the many and manifest conflicts of interest that exist between pharmaceutical companies, regulators and so called independent experts needs to be revealed and repaired so that never again can monetary or ego driven greed outweigh the health of so many young women and men worldwide.”

“My daughter was actually sterilized by the vaccine….My daughter recently tested sterile at age 21, although she is still getting a relatively normal period. Could it be that Merck intentionally developed this vaccine thinking it would affect a small number of individuals with PK deficiencies? Is this what their intent was when they developed their recently approved fertility drug Aleva, which was just passed for European use? I wonder if Merck and other big pharmas have intentionally taken advantage of genetic deficiencies. I believe they have, and I believe this is what has happened many, many times over. …After recent tests my daughter had done, I can now positively confirm that my daughter tested post-menopausal as it relates to her hormone levels, with no family history of early menopause. She is no longer ovulating and she has hormone levels of a 50-plus-year-old woman. My worst nightmares have come true…..I am pretty certain doctors aren’t even aware of the myriad of side effects they are saying are caused by PK deficiency. Remember, it’s relatively new, only discovered in 1996. It is horrifying to see previously perfectly healthy children now having seizures, migraines, pneumonias, personality disorders, fatigue, menstrual issues, vomiting, diarrhea, and the list goes on, post-Gardasil. This vaccine needs to be pulled immediately. Over 20,000 families are now begging for help, and no one is answering their desperate pleas."

“Just look at child vaccines. The more porn increase juvenile sexual activity, the more big pharma can step in with an Hepatitis B vaccine for infants. HepB is a sexually transmitted disease, and there is no reason to give the vaccine to babies. But big pharma has been making a fortune on it ever since states have begun mandating that all of our little darlings, with their wee tiny hearts and lungs and no immune system functioning, be shot up with it (and recently small girls with Human Papilloma Virus, HPV vaccines) all in the name of protecting them. What we don’t want to do is turn off the pornography flood (no administration has chosen to do that) because it fuels so many other things. And in the wings are vaccines for syphilis and gonorrhea and a whole host of other sexually transmitted diseases.”

“She says data available for Gardasil shows that it lasts five years; there is no data showing that it remains effective beyond five years. "

“One of their teenage daughters became severely ill after her first dose of Gardasil. Dr. Ratner says she’d have been better off getting cervical cancer than the vaccination. “My daughter went from a varsity lacrosse player at Choate to a chronically ill, steroid-dependent patient with autoimmune myofasciitis. I’ve had to ask myself why I let my eldest of three daughters get an unproven vaccine against a few strains of a nonlethal virus that can be dealt with in more effective ways.”

“The latest scandal is the cervical cancer vaccine. Very soon after its mass administration to very young girls, it transpired that it caused very serious reactions such as syncope, fainting, anaphylaxis, ascending paralysis (Guillain Barre syndrome) and even death. An epidemic of denials mushroomed despite many of these reactions being added to the list as post-marketing reports. Sure, the usual meaningless disclaimer accompanies the list, namely that the causal link to the offending vaccine has not been proven without qualifying what they would consider the evidence and proof of the causality. Yet, the reactions to vaccines fulfill all nine criteria of Bradford Hill, the father of medical statistics. Why would they be listed if the girls just imagined them? By the way, many girls were threatened with being admitted to a mental institution if they continued claiming that their observed serious reactions to Gardasil were caused by the vaccine. Who should be admitted into mental institutions? Surely not the girls experiencing the reactions, but those doctors and health officials who are accusing them of just imagining the experienced reactions while denying the PI listed reactions.”

“Merck has demonstrated that they are more than willing to gamble our children’s health on an unproven vaccine in return for immense profits. This magnitude of evil is rare, even for a drug company. “

“As of today, the Gardasil vaccine has never been proven to decrease the actual incidence of cervical cancer.

"…In fact, according to the text

Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology

, "In most studies, HPV status was not a strong independent prognosticator of outcome in cervical cancer patients; however there appears to be a trend for HPV-negative tumors to do worse …those tumors containing HPV DNA tend to be of an early stage and low grade."

***This suggests that if the goal is to reduce deaths from cervical cancer the target should not be HPV at all because the tumors without HPV actually "do worse."***** **—-

"A 17 year old was vaccinated with Gardasil when she was about one week pregnant. A subsequent ultrasound revealed that the fetus was positive for neural tube defect (a serious birth defect of the brain and spinal cord). A 20 year old female was vaccinated with her first dose of Gardasil during pregnancy and had a spontaneous abortion 10 days later."

“First of all why would you give young girls a vaccine, when they are 10 to 12 years old before they have even entered puberty? They are pre-puberty age. Why would you give it girls who are not even sexually active? It would make much more sense to give it to them once they became sexually active. It is so widespread I suspected right away that it was possibly an agent for sterilizing these women. It doesn’t make sense. It also makes these young women sick sometimes; there is a reaction to it.

It certainly hasn’t been tested adequately. So, why is there this big rush? I’d like to read something. This is also from Bertrand Russell’s book, The Impact of Science on Society, and this was published in 1952. He said *the Nazis were more scientific then the present rulers of Russia. If they had survived they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: Except possibly in the governing Aristocracy all but 5% of males and 30% of females will be sterilized. The 30% of females will be expected to spend their years from 18 to 40 in reproduction in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method. *That’s Bertrand Russell’s own words. Medical doctors and insiders today have told me that “wild reproduction” is not a desirable outcome in the future. Already we have terrible infertility problems in men and women. He also told me that in the near future the only way people will be able to get pregnant is to go into a hospital.”

“The first problem is that there are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are even theoretically linked with cervical cancer. In addition, HPV is present in at least half the normal population, almost never causing any disease or problems whatsoever. Indeed, HPV has never been proven as a pathogen for any disease.

….All that has ever been shown is that HPV is sometimes present in cervical cancer tissue, but as we know it’s also present in half the normal population. There is a total lack of evidence that cervical cancer appears in women with HPV more often than in women without it. And yet this will be the focus of the vaccine: to pretend to eliminate this ubiquitous virus from the body.

The second enormous impediment to credibility is that the average age for cervical cancer is 50 years. But the plan is to mandate Gardasil to 12 years olds. And the manufacturer is only claiming efficacy for 5 years. So using their own statistics, this makes the vaccine worthless in the long run, because by the time most females need immunity, it will have worn off long ago.

….The original phrase used by Merck to link HPV with cervical cancer was "there is a strong connection." How that phrase got transformed to ‘is the cause of’ in the past two years is more a matter of marketing than of science.

Gardasil’s not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment of fertility. That’s great. They want to vaccinate all American 12 year olds with a vaccine for cancer and they don’t even know for sure whether or not it causes cancer, or makes the recipients infertile. Yeah, sign my kid up for that one.”

She said that vaccinating little girls now is not going to protect them later. Since it can take a decade or more to even manifest itself as dysplasia, the HPVs against which this vaccine works may infect a little girl at the age she needs the vaccine most – meaning she will have to have a booster at the right point in time or she will not be protected. And, remember, it won’t work at all if she was positive for the virus when she was inoculated in the first place.

Merck knows this, Harper said. "To mandate now is simply to Merck’s benefit, and only to Merck’s benefit," she said.[March 2007]

“It is a frustrating time when our young girls and women are being lined up and jabbed with a vaccine that has the potential to affect their future fertility – HPV (Gardasil) vaccine – and that may be the least of the problems. Anyone with a HPV infection (and they are common), who is given the vaccine risks immune system shutdown or autoimmune disease. "Purpura vaccinatoria" – an abnormal immune system response has been recorded following vacination with smallpox and other vaccines when the vaccine recipient is already incubating the same infection. They are not testing for wart virus infection prior to vaccination. In the trials for this vaccine they were careful to exclude anyone with a wart virus or who developed a wart virus infection. They chose women who were not likely to have more than one sexual partner, thereby minimising this risk. THIS IS AN UNKNOWN RISK FACTOR but when you read the reports already in from overseas you will see that once again vaccination is not rocket science, unless you equate it with the ones that explode and obliterate! How Safe is Gardasil ? – (http://www.visainfo.org.au/pages…) Extracted from the Immunise Australia Literature

“ The pharmaceutical-supported mainstream media, and the Merck-supported Public Broadcasting Service uncritically accept the claim that human papillomavirus is the cause of cervical cancer in women, despite the absence of supporting medical evidence. There’s also no discussion of the one pharmaceutical merchandise (i.e.: feminine hygiene products) that is the most likely cause of this cancer.”

It seems illogical and too simplistic that a vaccine can prevent cancer. I suggest that this vaccine is another delusional hope for reducing the risk of cancer, and a great generator of revenue for the vaccine inventors and manufacturers.”

“It is a frustrating time when our young girls and women are being lined up and jabbed with a vaccine that has the potential to affect their future fertility – HPV (Gardasil) vaccine – and that may be the least of the problems. Anyone with a HPV infection (and they are common), who is given the vaccine risks immune system shutdown or autoimmune disease. "Purpura vaccinatoria" – an abnormal immune system response has been recorded following vacination with smallpox and other vaccines when the vaccine recipient is already incubating the same infection. They are not testing for wart virus infection prior to vaccination. In the trials for this vaccine they were careful to exclude anyone with a wart virus or who developed a wart virus infection. They chose women who were not likely to have more than one sexual partner, thereby minimising this risk. THIS IS AN UNKNOWN RISK FACTOR but when you read the reports already in from overseas you will see that once again vaccination is not rocket science, unless you equate it with the ones that explode and obliterate! How Safe is Gardasil ? – (http://www.visainfo.org.au/pages…) Extracted from the Immunise Australia Literature

“If tumours without HPV actually do worse, then what might be the flow on effects of using an HPV vaccine? Might cervical cancer actually become more serious and more deadly? Is this a stone that hasn’t been turned over yet?

Have you ever seen a Public Health Worker sit down with young women, with the huge pile of medical articles which show for instance, that nutrient deficiencies (selenium and folic acid to mention only two) are a key component in the development of cervical cancer? By impressing on everyone the need to get nutrition right, Public Health Workers would not only reduce the potential development of cervical cancer from a young age, they might also slash the rates of all other cancers, infections, diabetes complications, and many other hospitalizations.”

“Three deaths were related to the vaccine. One physician’s assistant reported that a female patient “died of a blood clot three hours after getting the Gardasil vaccine.” Two other reports, on girls 12 and 19, reported deaths relating to heart problems and/or blood clotting.“The FDA adverse event reports on the HPV vaccine read like a catalog of horrors,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton…..Of the 42 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 18 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortion to fetal abnormities.”

Merck’s marketing strategy for HPV vaccine includes enlisting patent-holding scientists and paid Merck consultants to hype it as a lifestyle vaccine that should be pumped into the bodies of every pre-adolescent girl in the country. Just in case she forgets to wait until she gets married to have sex; or the guy she marries has had sex; or, apparently, just in case the guy she marries has sex with someone else while he is married to her. Can this marketing strategy get any more annoying? And can these entrepreneuring vaccinologists twist themselves into a more convoluted pretzel with their junk science morality?

The truth is that most boys and girls and men and women who have had sex have been exposed to HPV and clear the virus naturally from their bodies and go on to lead perfectly normal, healthy lives. For the very tiny minority of women who, for unknown reasons, develop a persistent HPV infection, it can be identified through pap smears. Cervical cancer from HPV infection develops only after many years of unidentified, persistent HPV infection. Regular check- ups with pap smears are a much more cost-effective prevention than paying Merck and HPV vaccine patent holders $360 for 3 doses of HPV vaccine to inject into every American teenager (Merck and the CDC are making noises that they want all pre- adolescent boys to get it too).”

Gardasil, the heavily promoted cervical cancer and genital wart vaccine that Merck, the CDC and AAP want to mandate for all 11 and 12 year old girls, will not only increase the risk of cervical cancer for some of adolescent girls but can also make them susceptible to infection from the multiple other strains of HPV. In addition, five women who got the vaccine around time of conception gave birth to babies with birth defects.”

“The "Breakthrough" Headlines Have Been Running All Week About A New Vaccine For Cervical Cancer – This Is Medical Science And Health Journalism At Its Worst And A Shameful Example Of How Medical Research Is Taking Dangerous Short-Cuts And Badly Misleading The Public

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.

A study published in December, 2005 discovered that Tween80 can cause anaphylaxis, a sometimes fatal reaction characterized by a sharp drop in blood pressure, hives, and breathing difficulties. Researchers concluded that the severe reaction was not a typical allergic response characterized by the combination of IgE antibodies and the release of histamines; it was caused by a serious disruption that had occurred within the immune system.”

“According to the World Intellectual Property Organization, which is part of the United Nations, scientists from the organization are developing vaccines specifically to damage fertility as a method of contraception. A suggested ingredient for the vaccine is tween 80 (polysorbate 80): “In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.” (Fertility Impairing Vaccine And Methods of Use’ This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998.)

“The current research on the stabilizer Tween 80 reveals the following: “Neonatal female rats were injected ip (0.1 ml/rat) with Tween 80 in 1, 5 or 10 percent aqueous solution on days 4-7 after birth. Treatment with Tween 80 accelerated maturation, prolonged the oestrus cycle, and induced persistent vaginal oestrus. The relative weight of the uterus and ovaries was decreased relative to the untreated controls. Squamous cell metaplasia of the epithelial lining of the uterus and cytological changes in the uterus were indicative of chronic oestrogenic stimulation. Ovaries were without corpora lutea, and had degenerative follicles.” ~ PMID: 8473002. Female lab rats injected with Tween 80 developed impaired sexual organs as well as premature development of their sexual organs.”

"Previous studies by Gajdova et al. have shown that polysorbate 80 (also known as Tween 80) administered by intraperitoneal injection to neonatal female rats on days 4-7 after birth produced estrogenic effects including earlier vaginal opening, prolongation of the estrus cycle and persistent vaginal estrus. Some of these effects were evident many weeks after cessation of administration of polysorbate 80." [Gajdova et al – "Delayed effects of
neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats." Food Chem Toxicol 31(3):183-90 (1993) Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Limbova, Bratislava.]

Gajdova M, Jakubovsk (Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats.) Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats.

Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90. PMID: 8473002 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Neonatal female rats were injected ip (0.1 ml/rat) with Tween 80 in 1, 5 or 10% aqueous solution on days 4-7 after birth. Treatment with Tween 80 accelerated maturation, prolonged the oestrus cycle, and induced persistent vaginal oestrus. The relative weight of the uterus and ovaries was decreased relative to the untreated controls. Squamous cell metaplasia of the epithelial lining of the uterus and cytological changes in the uterus were indicative of chronic oestrogenic stimulation. Ovaries were without corpora lutea, and had degenerative follicles. PMID: 8473002 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

Polysorbate-80 is used in pharmacology to assist in the delivery of certain drugs or chemotherapeutic agents across the blood-brain-barrier. What viral, bacterial, yeast, heavy metal or other vaccine containing ingredient need to pass into the brains of our children? Do they belong in the brain? Is that part of the needed immune response to protect our children from disease? Do vaccine materials pass across the blood-brain barrier with the help of Polysorbate-80? If so, are there complications from being in the brains of our children? Is this another connection to help us get an understanding of why 1 in 150 children have autism, or 1 in 6 children has developmental/learning disabilities?”

In a message dated 5/26/2007 1:30:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

The statistics only include the ones that were REPORTED!!!!

I know personally a woman who was in the study. A 19 yr old girl, not sexually active. She took the money to pay for her college, in nursing program.

She took the injections, and got very sick after the second one. They told her it was coincidence. Teh third one, she started spotting after. So they REMOVED HER FROM THE STUDY AS A MINOR ADVERS REACTION.

A subsequent pap smear showed abnormal cells (prior to they tested each girl to assure she was cancer free for statistical and study qualificiation purposes). The second and third pap showed increased cells and highly virulent strain of cervical cancer. She had to quit school for treatment on her cancer.

They had to sterilize her (complete ovario hysterectomy) and the cancer may or may not be under control at this time. She tried to report it, but the group doing the study said no results could be considered because she was dropped from the study!!!!

Pap smears

‘They con women into either biopsies or surgery for their cervix before they really have any problem. The pap smear itself can cause enough inflammation to give you a bad pap smear the next time. The pap smears are classified into five categories…1,2,3, and 4 and 5. Class 1 pap smear means nothing: you are fine. A class 2 pap smear and the gynecologist says, “Well, you know we got a problem here.” All a class 2 pap smear means is inflammation is present. These are not cancer grades. These are pap smear classifications. You can have that inflammation from one sexual intercourse, because the penis might bump against the cervix. You could have that inflammation from using a tampon that may have some bleach on it that caused some inflammation. You could have that inflammation just from taking antibiotics, which gave you a little bit of a yeast infection…You didn’t even notice the cause of the inflammation, but a doctor goes, “Well, inflammation is present, we better go farther. Let’s do a biopsy.” In the old days, a biopsy used to be, “We’ll take a little piece of that tissue.” Nowadays, they do what is called a ‘cone-biopsy’, which means they freeze the cervix and just take it off.
They take the whole tip of the cervix off. Then they figure, “Well look, why do a biopsy? We’ll probably find cancer. We might as well get rid of the cervix and do it all in one treatment. And if we don’t, she’ll probably get cancer eventually.” If a woman is checked five years later and is full of cancer, she can sue for malpractice if the biopsy was not done, so a doctor has every reason to cover himself and do it. I have had numerous women come who have had that procedure just from a class two pap smear. Okay, the average woman who comes to me thinking she is riddled with cancer, it’s because she’s had a class two pap smear. I have to show them the medical books and let them read class two pap smear and it says, “Inflammation of the cervix.” Well, you can hit your arm and you have inflammation. That’s all it means. I would say that 99% of the women reading this don’t have cancer, they just have inflammation.

Even a class three pap smear still doesn’t mean that you have cancer. It means that you have more advanced inflammation, and that there are cells that could be cancer. It still doesn’t mean you have cancer. A class four and five, of course, means that there are cancer cells present, but I’ve had hundreds of women with a class four and five pap smear who have turned it right around by cleaning that area and detoxifying that area of the body. But rarely do I find anybody with a class four or five, because by the time they are class two, or at least by the time they are at class three, a doctor has already done a biopsy or taken that cervix right off the uterus. The cervix is the mouth or the neck of the uterus. It’s the opening of the uterus, and it has to dilate when you are going to have a baby. So this can not only affect your future pregnancy, it can affect sexual intercourse; it can affect birth control, if you are using a cervical cap, and it can set up all sorts of problems. Of course, it can cause inflammation and disease which could lead to cancer.” Dr Schulze

The Sam Biser ‘Save your Life’ Herbal Video Collection on WHALE


ALTERNATIVE NEWS

“He Died As A Direct Result of the HPV Vaccine” – Mother Of Dead Teenager Speaks Out

March 1, 2019

By Arjun Walia

https://www.collective-evolution.com/2019/03/01/he-died-as-a-direct-result-of-the-hpv-vaccine-mother-of-dead-teenager-speaks-out/

IN BRIEF

· The Facts:

Christopher Bunch is a teenager who recently died as a result of the HPV vaccine, according to his mother, who has started an online petition to help stop and bring more awareness to the dangers associated with the HPV vaccine.

· Reflect On:

With so many adverse reactions, so many studies and so many scientists questioning this vaccine, why does the mainstream make it ‘taboo’ to even question it?

HPV vaccine injuries are no longer extremely rare. In fact, neither are vaccine injuries in general. This is exemplified by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). To date, it’s paid approximately $4 billion to families with vaccine injured children. These adverse reactions are the reason why the Japanese government, for example, suspended its recommendation of the HPV vaccine. It’s also important to note that these injuries only take into account 1 percent of all vaccine injured children, seeing as how 99 percent of vaccine injuries go completely unreported. (source)

advertisement – learn more

Furthermore, the NCVIA completely protects pharmaceutical companies from any blame, which means that they can get away with being completely careless with their products.

The latest example to make noise regarding HPV vaccine injury is Jennifer Robi, a 24-year-old former athlete and scholar who has been confined to a wheelchair since receiving her third Gardasil vaccine at the age of sixteen. She suffers continual uncontrolled neuro/muscular contractions (jerking), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), and many other symptoms of systemic autoimmune dysregulation.

Jennifer’s attorney, Sol Ajalat, initially brought her case in Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and then, following a judgment in the program, elected to proceed in civil court. Since VICA (the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act) forbids recoveries for product defect or negligence, Ajalat brought Jennifer’s civil case under the theories that Merck committed fraud during its clinical trials and then failed to warn Jennifer (and, by implication, other injured girls) about the high risks and overstated benefits of the vaccine.

You can read more about that story here.

Another example I’ve written about in the past is a boy named Colton Berrett. You can read more about his case and watch an interview with him and his mother here.

advertisement – learn more

Scrolling through Colton’s mother’s Facebook page is how I became aware of another recent case. Mind you, there are thousands of cases but none of them seem to receive any media attention. This tragic case affected a young 14-year-old boy named Christopher Bunch, and nobody is hearing about his case either.

His mother recently started a petition to create more awareness, and it reads as follows, detailing her son’s story:

My 14 year old son received the 1st dose of the deadly and useless HPV VACCINE on June 29th 2018 and after only 46 days later he passed away on August 14th 2018. We took him to put local ER on the night of August 8th. They did testing for any virus or infection and all blood work came back negative. The Dr’s suggested my son be moved to Children’s Hospital in Iowa City. It was there that the Dr’s discovered my son had encephalitis. The Neurologist them came in and diagnosed him with ADEM DISEASE. From that point on my son spiraled downhill fast. He then went into respiratory failure, paralysis to the left side of his body, then stated having seizures. He was being treated with extremely high doses of steroids to combat the swelling in his brain. His case was so severe at this point that they had no other choice but to perform a craniotomy on the right side of his skull to help with brain swelling. His brain continued to swell and he ended up having a brain herniation. He was pronounced brain dead on August 14th 2018. My son was only 14 years old, bright, smart, handsome, awesome baseball player, he was on the honor roll and just 2 days from starting high school. He died as a direct result of the HPV VACCINE. My son should have never been given this medicine as he has NO CERVIX! This drug has not been proven to prevent cervical cancer. Japan named this drug in 2014 because of so many adverse reactions. My son Christopher Bunch and another child named Colton Berrett both died as a result of the HPV VACCINE. There are hundreds of children that have died and thousands more that have been injured.

Christopher’s story was mentioned by Global News, who used the headline “Boy, 14, Dies of Rare Neurological Disease After Complaining of A Headache.” The story does briefly point out that “In rare cases, it can also occur after vaccination for measles, mumps, or rubella. In other cases, however, ADEM can set in without any triggers. Maynard said that her son had both recently had an infection and received vaccinations.”

ADEM disease is brain inflammation, which can occur following an HPV vaccination.

When one looks at the independent literature, so studies that are not sponsored by the vaccine manufacturers, so with relation to Gardasil there have been several reports documenting multiple sclerosis and encephalitis, which is brain inflammation, in girls who have received their Gardasil vaccine.”– Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow at the University of British Columbia where she works in Neurosciences and the Department of Medicine (source)

In July 2016, a case was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, Los Angeles County (central district). The case involved a 16-year-old female who, between 2010 and 2011, received three injections of Gardasil, the HPV vaccination manufactured by Merck. Shortly after she received her third vaccination, she suffered a severe adverse reaction, the nature and complexity of which failed to be diagnosed until 2015 when she finally received the diagnosis of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS).

The family decided to file a case against the manufacturer of the vaccine, Merck.

It is a well-known fact that all pharmaceutical products must undergo extensive pre-marketing clinical trials, often spanning several years before the FDA can consider the product for licensing.

The complaint written by the family’s attorney stated that:

“Upon approval by the FDA of the Gardasil vaccine, Defendants Merck, Does 1 through 25, and each of them commenced and engaged in highly extensive, and aggressive marketing practices, which were designed primarily, if not solely, to increase the sales and profits from Gardasil. In doing so, Defendants Merck, Does 1 through 25, and each of them, in order to preclude any and all questions by consumers, patients and others, as to the effectiveness, safety and need for the administration of the Gardasil vaccination as well as the risks of serious adverse reaction related thereto, intentionally, wrongfully and deceitfully withheld, failed to provide and concealed from consumers, patients and others material facts and information with respect to the effectiveness, safety and need for the administration of the Gardasil vaccination, as well as the risks of serious adverse reaction related thereto and as in part hereafter set forth.”

The complaint continued by describing each and every misdemeanour that Merck was thought to have participated in. It stated:

“Further, Defendants Merck and Does 1 through 25 in its Marketing wrongfully and deceitfully failed to unambiguously inform those to whom the marketing was directed, of material facts and information which they knew or should have ascertained through their investigations and studies specific to risk/ benefit and quantitative risk assessments regarding and including, among other things, the following:

1. The five-year period that the Gardasil vaccine was then only known to be effective;
2. That Gardasil was effective only as to certain and not other strains of the HPV virus;
3. The Gardasil vaccine is not effective once an individual is infected with the HPV virus;
4. Other existing methods that are effective in avoiding HPV viral infections;
5. The minimal risk that even once the individual was infected with the HPV virus the infection would result in precancerous lesions;
6. The successfulness of exiting methods of diagnosing and treating HPV precancerous lesions;
7. The successfulness of exiting methods of diagnosing and treating any resulting cancer;
8. The nature as the consequences of serious adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine; and
9. Other items related and material to risk/benefit and quantitative risk assessments not now known and if required leave of Court will be requested to amend this complaint to set forth fully such item or items when ascertained.

Such information was and is reasonably required by patients and consumers as well as others when considering and deciding whether or not under their individual and personal circumstances to be vaccinated with Gardasil.”

Not only did the family and their attorney outline an excellent and well thought out case, they went one step further and suggested that the court hold a Science Day Hearing.

This kind of thing also compliments documents that were uncovered by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic (quoted earlier in the article). The documents reveal that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) made “continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates, which they deemed were necessary for herd immunity.” (source)

Shouldn’t it be illegal to deliberately conceal information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an official vaccination schedule?

When I came across a study published in the journal Pediatrics where researchers used a national survey asking approximately 600 doctors to outline their stance on the HPV vaccine, I was pleased to find the study discovered that a large percentage of paediatricians and family doctors, approximately one third of those surveyed, did not strongly recommend the HPV vaccine to parents and preteens. It would have been great if the study went into the reasons they don’t support this vaccine, as many doctors severely lack knowledge about vaccines, the bioaccumulation of their ingredients, etc. They’re often only able to explain how vaccines work, but then their knowledge regarding vaccines doesn’t extend beyond that, unfortunately. A study published in the journal EbioMedicineprovides deeper insight into this, stating how, “over the past two decades several vaccine controversies have emerged in various countries… including adverse effects and eroding confidence in health authorities, experts, and science.” The study points out that, for these reasons, vaccine hesitancy has been observed in the general population and continues to increase.

These are all important things to discuss, and it’s important to note that vaccine hesitancy is now being observed because of science. This is an important point because, as we move through 2019, “anti-vaccination” proponents have been classified as one of the biggest health threats according to the World Health Organization (WHO). If questioning vaccine safety and having a discussion about it is a threat, something is very wrong here. When one side makes the other feel stupid, or even forbids one from questioning something, that is far from science.

An Example

Like I said, there are many concerns regarding vaccines, including their ingredients. Heavy metal adjuvants have been added to vaccines for more than 100 years without any safety testing at all. They’ve simply been presumed safe.

“Despite their long use as active agents of medicines and fungicides, the safety levels of these substances have never been determined, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children.” – Jose G. Dorea, Professor at the University of Brasilia’s department of nutritional sciences. (source)

A 2012 study published in BioMed Centraloutlined this point quite clearly when it found that “Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen.”

Then, in 2015, a study published in Frontiers of Neurologyexplained why this biopersistence — demonstrated by its “capacity to migrate in lymphoid organs and then disseminate throughout the body within monocyte-lineage cells and progressively accumulate in the brain”— is so troublesome. It also pointed out that, “in spite of their long usage, the literature has pointed out that the adjuvanticity mechanisms of aluminum salts remain basically unknown despite most active investigation in the field in recent years.” This is also true for other vaccine ingredients like MSG, mercury, aborted human fetal cells, animal DNA, etc.

Fast forward to today, and we now know that injected aluminum doesn’t come under the same methods of excretion as aluminum taken in from eating food, for example. We know it gets carried by macrophages (white blood cells) and deposited into distant organs and the brain. After this, scientists actually decided to open up the brain of multiple autistic people and discovered the highest brain aluminum content ever found inside of brain tissue. You an read more about that and access those studies here.

As you can see, this is simply aluminum, and represents one of many reasons why more people are becoming hesitant to give their children heavily marketed vaccines. It’s plausible to believe that they are not as safe as they are advertised to be.

Why is this conversation trying to be shut down by health authorities? What is going on here?

Behavioral abnormalities in female mice following administration of aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil have also been observed.

“Vaccine adjuvants and vaccines may induce autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations in susceptible individuals. To date most human vaccine trials utilize aluminum (Al) adjuvants as placebos despite much evidence showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures can be toxic to humans and animals…It appears that Gardasil via its Al adjuvant and HPV antigens has the ability to trigger neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions, further leading to behavioral changes…In light of these findings, this study highlights the necessity of proceeding with caution with respect to further mass-immunization practices with a vaccine of yet unproven long-term clinical benefit in cervical cancer prevention.” (source)

Another study published in Clinical Rheumatology exposes how vaccine manufacturers used phoney placebos in clinical trials to conceal a wide range of devastating risks associated with HPV vaccines. Instead of using genuine inert placebos and comparing health impacts over a number of years, as is required for most new drug approvals, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline spiked their placebos with a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant and cut observation periods to a matter of months.

Researchers from Mexico’s National Institute of Cardiology pored over 28 studies published throughout January 2017—16 randomized trials and 12 post-marketing case series—pertaining to the three human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines currently on the market globally. In their July 2017 peer-reviewed report, the authors, Manuel Martínez-Lavin and Luis Amezcua-Guerra, uncovered evidence of numerous adverse events including life-threatening injuries, permanent disabilities, hospitalizations, and deaths reported after vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline’s bivalent Cervarix vaccine and Merck’s quadrivalent or nine-valent HPV vaccines (Gardasil and Gardasil 9).

Multiple peer-reviewed studies have connected aluminum exposures to a range of autoimmune and neurological disorders including dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. A review in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition warned of dangerous accumulation of aluminum in the brain when, in the case of vaccinations, “protective gastrointestinal mechanisms are bypassed.” It’s time to go back to the drawing board on HPV vaccines and aluminum adjuvants. More importantly, the FDA needs to start enforcing the same rigorous pre-licensing safety testing for vaccines that has long been required for other drugs.

You can read more about that particular study here.

Does It Make Sense To Get The Vaccine? The Takeaway

Does it make sense to allow your child to get the HPV vaccine? Though there are many factors that go into making this important decision, I believe the risks outweigh the benefits.

There are approximately 130 strains of HPV, and only about 15 of them are known to be associated with cervical cancer. And the vaccine only provides protection against 4 specific strains. (The vaccine also only provides approximately 5 years immunity, so you have to ask yourself: What are the odds your 12-14 year old teenager will get one of these strains in the 5 year immunity period that the vaccine provides?

Furthermore, 95 percent of HPV infections are removed from the body by the immune system, you don’t even have to detect it or treat it, the body will simply get rid of it all by itself. 1 percent of the remaining 5 percent, if not identified and removed, will develop into pre cancerous cells which will take approximately 5 years, and then a small percentage of this remaining 1 percent will progress into reversible cancer which is a process that will take approximately 15 to 30 years.

Even after that, if you’re asking, “Why risk it?” Well, if you read the information above and are aware of the risks of the ingredients like aluminum as well as the adverse reactions, you will see why, in my opinion, it’s not worth it.

It’s okay to question vaccine safety, and it’s okay to choose to not let your child be vaccinated with the HPV vaccine.

Dianne Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved has also been quite outspoken about the vaccine in the past:

“The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.” “She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent. Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.” (source)

The Gardasil vaccine may actually be responsible for the rise in cervical cancer rates in multiple countries. You can read more about that and view the evidence for such claims here.

The demand for Collective Evolution’s content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.

In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!

Sincerely,

James Robert Deal
Real Estate Attorney & Real Estate Managing Broker

James
PO Box 2276 Lynnwood WA 98036
Law Office Line: 425-771-1110
Broker Line: 425-774-6611
Cell and Text Line: 425-670-1405
KW Everett Office Line: 425-212-2007
Fax: 425-776-8081
Paypal.me/jamesrobertdeal
WashingtonAttorneyBroker.com
WashingtonAttorneyBroker.com/Helping-Buyers
WashingtonAttorneyBroker.com/Helping-Sellers
WashingtonAttorneyBroker.com/Helping-Brokers
WashingtonAttorneyBroker.com/Seller-Financing
Cell phone real estate app: app.kw.com/KW2V4HP64/
Desktop real estate app: jamesrobertdeal.kw.com
Mortgage-Modification-Attorney.com
Fluoride-Class-Action.com/Safewater
JamesRobertDeal.org/Smart-Meters
JamesRobertDeal.org/Attorneys-Viewpoint-Vaccinations
JamesRobertDeal.org/Door-To-Door-Transit
WhatToServeAGoddess.com/Music-By-Jimmie-Deal

If you like our work, give us a review on Zillow
If you like our work, give us a review on Google
If you like our work, give us a thumbs up review on Yelp

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share This
%d bloggers like this: