How to Convince An Anti Vaxxer
Vinu Arumugham, Engineer
It is impossible. The anti-vaxxers have science on their side. Quit trying. …
The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) reviewed the entire literature from 1950 to 2011 and wrote in:
“Conclusion 10.6: The evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between diphtheria toxoid–, tetanus toxoid–, or acellular pertussis–containing vaccine and autism.”
Vaccine “expert” Dr. Stanley Plotkin referring to the above in a court deposition:
Pg. 249: Dr. Plotkin says about the DTap vaccine: “I would say it is logically true that you cannot say, you cannot point to proof that it doesn’t cause autism.”
However, the CDC proclaims “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”:
So proof, CDC/FDA/AAP and the vaccine makers are all liars.
Boeing has product liability. That did not stop the corruption, incompetence, greed and fraud. Vaccine makers have no product liability. What do you expect in their case?
Boeing has had a history of IMPROVING product safety but is susceptible to corruption, incompetence, greed and fraud, off and on.
In contrast, vaccine makers have made ZERO safety improvements to vaccines for decades even though safety improvements are required by law.
Boeing $15 million to Congress in 2018
Vaccines and Biologics injury table based on mechanistic evidence – Mar 2019
PDF with hyperlinks: https://zenodo.org/record/258263…
Medical science is an oxymoron.
Vaccine safety is an oxymoron.
Prof. Ioannidis of Stanford University School of Medicine wrote:
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Quality and value: The true purpose of peer review
“… scientists understand that peer review per se provides only a minimal assurance of quality, and that the public conception of peer review as a stamp of authentication is far from the truth.”
What’s Wrong with Science—and How to Fix It
Skeptical of medical science reports?
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine” (1).
More recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2).
Ioannidis: Most Research Is Flawed; Let’s Fix It
Show trial against co-founder of the Cochrane Collaboration Peter C. Gøtzsche leading to his expulsion from Cochrane.
Transparency Hasn’t Stopped Drug Companies From Corrupting Medical Research
Dr. Milton Packer:
Is Journal Peer-Review Now Just a Game?
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it. -Niels Bohr
Anyone who is not shocked by vaccine safety problems has not understood it …
Anyone who does not know the root cause of food allergies, asthma, autism and autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes, is UNQUALIFIED to make claims about vaccine safety.
James Robert Deal
Real Estate Attorney & Real Estate Managing Broker
PO Box 2276 Lynnwood WA 98036
Law Office Line: 425-771-1110
Broker Line: 425-774-6611
KW Everett Office Line: 425-212-2007
I help buyers, sellers, brokers. Flat fee payable at closing.
Property search: JamesRobertDeal.com